Home/By Age Group/Gen Z and AI Companion Apps
By Age Group

Gen Z and AI Companion Apps

AI companion apps — Character.AI, Replika, Nomi, and general chatbots used the same way — have quietly become commonplace among young people. In a nationally representative survey of U.S. teens, nearly three-quarters had used an AI companion at least once, over half were regular users, and a third used them daily or several times a week. These apps are unusually sticky, averaging more than ten times the monthly sessions of ordinary assistant or messaging apps. The motivations are mostly ordinary — social interaction, entertainment, curiosity — and most teens still see companions as tools and prioritize real friendships. But the data also surfaces genuine concern: a notable share find AI conversations as satisfying as real ones, and some discuss serious problems with AI instead of a person. Given documented safety risks, the leading research nonprofit in this area recommends against companion use by minors. This page presents the adoption, motivations, engagement, and the real benefit-and-risk picture — factually.

4 visualizations 4 sources Last updated June 2026 Free to embed
Loading chart...
Loading chart...
Chart 1 · Adoption

Teen use of AI companion apps

Teen use of AI companion apps (Common Sense 2025)

Loading chart...
Source: Common Sense Media 2025 (nationally representative, 1,060 teens 13–17): 72% have used an AI companion at least once, 52% are regular users (a few times a month or more), and 34% use them daily or several times a week. Defined to include Character.AI, Replika, Nomi — and general tools like ChatGPT used that way.
Chart 2 · Why they use them

What teens use AI companions for

Why teens use AI companions

Loading chart...
Source: Common Sense Media (via TechCrunch) 2025: top reasons — social interaction/relationships 33%, entertainment 30%, curiosity about the tech 28%, advice 18%, and “always available” 17%. Nearly half (46%) see companions as tools, not friends. Multiple-select.
Chart 3 · Engagement

Companion apps are unusually sticky

Companion apps: ~10x the sessions of other apps

Loading chart...
Source: Andreessen Horowitz / Common Sense (via Axios) 2025: companion apps average more than 10x the monthly sessions of general assistant, content, or even messaging apps — the most engagement-intensive AI category. High stickiness is the defining trait of the companion segment.
Chart 4 · The risk picture

Real benefits, documented dangers

The benefit-and-risk picture (teens keep some perspective)

Loading chart...
Source: Common Sense Media 2025: 31% of teens say AI conversations are as or more satisfying than talking with real friends, and 33% have discussed serious issues with AI instead of a person — even as 80% prioritize real friendships and 50% distrust AI advice. Citing documented safety risks, Common Sense recommends no one under 18 use AI companions.

About this data

This page presents data on AI companion app use among young people, anchored on Common Sense Media’s 2025 nationally representative survey of 1,060 U.S. teens (ages 13–17), with engagement data from Andreessen Horowitz and reporting from TechCrunch, Axios, and CBS News. We present this topic factually, including documented safety concerns, without sensationalizing.

The AI Behavior Index is the research arm of OneChat AI, an integrated multi-model AI platform. We compile and analyze data from primary research sources to make AI adoption and market trends more accessible to journalists, researchers, and decision-makers.

A note on age scope and safety: the strongest companion-app data covers teens 13–17, which overlaps with but is younger than the 18–25 core of Gen Z — we label this throughout, since adult-companion-user data (e.g. Replika’s older skew) is patchier. This is also a documented child-safety topic: we report the benefits teens describe and the risks researchers have found, and we relay Common Sense Media’s recommendation against minor use rather than editorializing around it.

Methodology notes: figures are from Common Sense Media’s probability-based teen survey (1,060 respondents, 13–17) and are multiple-select where noted. The definition of “AI companion” is broad — it includes purpose-built apps (Character.AI, Replika) and general tools (ChatGPT) used for companionship — so figures capture a usage pattern, not a single app category. The 10x engagement figure is from a16z product data. This data describes teens, not all of Gen Z; adult (18–25) companion-specific data is more limited.

Sources used on this page:

Corrections or suggestions: research@aibehaviorindex.org

For Journalists & Researchers

Use this data in your work.

Every statistic, chart, and graphic in this index is free to use and cite, with full source attribution. Can’t easily find what you need? Use our search bar to search by keyword, topic, or category.

✉️
Talk to our research team
Need a specific cut of data, an interview, or a quote? Email us — we typically respond within one business day.
research@aibehaviorindex.org →

How the data works

Every statistic shown is sourced from a publicly available study, survey, or report. We aggregate, organize, and contextualize this data — but the underlying research is conducted by the cited sources. Click any source link to access the original methodology. If you run into any issues or have a study to suggest, contact us at research@aibehaviorindex.org.